[CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855

[Johnny Hughes]

On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:53 -0500, David Thompson wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> >There is a centosplus kernel that has that errata ... it is version:
> > kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4
> 
> Excellent.  Is there a general way to map from upstream errata kernels to 
> centosplus kernels?  The (apparently??) previous convention of suffixing 
> .106.unsupported to the upstream release number seemed to work well, and I 
> don't want to either guess or take up mailing list bandwidth asking every time 
> upstream revs.

It worked great .... except when this update came :)

2.6.9-34.106.unsupported .... 

RH puts out 2.6.9-34.0.1

2.6.9-34.0.1.106.unsupported IS not an upgrade for
2.6.9-34.106.unsupported  .... since 106 > 0

:)

For a more detail discussion ... see this post from last week :)

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-May/065273.html

Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060601/2f366264/attachment.sig>