[CentOS] rpm mgetty (fax)

[William L. Maltby]

On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 01:15 +0200, anne linux wrote:
> Thank you for your answers. 
> 
> I compiled mgetty 1.1.33 (with maj fedora), but I don't  know if it is well for security
> 
> yum --noplugins --enablerepo=\* list mgetty :
> Installed Packages
> mgetty.i386                              1.1.33-02              installed
> Available Packages
> mgetty.i386                              1.1.31-2               base

Generally, folks will counsel *against* this as it starts down the path
of defeating the purpose of enterprise-class CentOS - high stability,
reliability, and long life - by increasing difficulty of maintenance by
having stuff added out of the package system or from another release
upon which CentOS stuff has not been tested. However, the need must come
first, IMO, and you are following up to see if it can be supported.

> 
> I will ask dag, rpmforge or another. 
> 

That should protect you from the slings and arrows of outrageous ...
OOPS! Slipped into Shakespearean mode! Should suppress most gripes! :-)

> anne
> <snip sig stuff>

Good luck and enjoy.

-- 
Bill
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060604/25fe9e02/attachment.sig>