[CentOS] Swap memory: I can't reconcile this stuff.
Kai Schaetzl
maillists at conactive.com
Mon Jun 5 23:34:46 UTC 2006
William L. Maltby wrote on Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:45:10 -0400:
> 24729 127m 32m 15m 4.3 94m evolution
It looks to me like top is using a different definition of swap. If you
compare you see that SWAP shows the difference between VIRT and RES almost
exactly. However, if there is no or almost no swap usage how can there be
a difference? Only explanation: it shows what *could* be swapped
immediately without affecting current activity.
Have you tried making it heavily swap and then checked if you see a
difference (whichever)? Theoretically, it shouldn't make a difference as
it doesn't seem to differentiate between "swapped" and "really swapped".
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
More information about the CentOS
mailing list