[CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
David Thompson
thomas at cs.wisc.eduThu Jun 1 21:53:41 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Next message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johnny Hughes wrote: > >There is a centosplus kernel that has that errata ... it is version: > kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4 Excellent. Is there a general way to map from upstream errata kernels to centosplus kernels? The (apparently??) previous convention of suffixing .106.unsupported to the upstream release number seemed to work well, and I don't want to either guess or take up mailing list bandwidth asking every time upstream revs. >However ... if the only thing you need from the centosplus kernel is the >xfs ... you should use the normal (non-centosplus) kernel and the >kernel-xfs-module that matches it from here: > >http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/ > >or > >http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/ Ooooh. That would be cool. I'll look into it. Thanks again. Dave Thompson UW-Madison
- Previous message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Next message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list