[CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
James Pearson
james-p at moving-picture.comFri Jun 2 16:20:43 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Next message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Thompson wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >>There is a centosplus kernel that has that errata ... it is version: >>kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4 >> >>However ... if the only thing you need from the centosplus kernel is the >>xfs ... you should use the normal (non-centosplus) kernel and the >>kernel-xfs-module that matches it from here: >> >>http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/i386/RPMS/ >> >>or >> >>http://dev.centos.org/centos/4/testing/x86_64/RPMS/ >> >>(That code is from SGI and has all the latest patches.) > > > Do I understand from this that (for example) kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-34.0.1.EL- > 0.1-2.i686.rpm contains xfs errata this is not present in (the centosplus) > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4.i686.rpm? Looking at the patch referenced in your original posting, it looks like it is in the kernel-module-xfs code and not in the centosplus kernel code. James Pearson
- Previous message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Next message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list