[CentOS] Kernel update = slower ?
William L. Maltby
BillsCentOS at triad.rr.comSun Jun 4 17:52:55 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Kernel update = slower ?
- Next message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 12:53 -0400, Sam Drinkard wrote: > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > >On Sun, 2006-06-04 at 09:57 -0400, Sam Drinkard wrote: > > > > > >>William L. Maltby wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 19:18 -0400, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >>><snip> > We'll see what happens this afternoon when the model completes. I'm > hoping for good results. Good luck on it. Esp. hope the lock up is gone forever. -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060604/ac0e432d/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Kernel update = slower ?
- Next message: [CentOS] [CSL #301925] centosplus kernel xfs patches and CVE-2006-1855
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list