On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 12:30 -0500, Steve wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: > > >Umm... I was led to believe that I might need a 586-specific one by the > >fact that the base system must provide one for installs to succeed, IIRC > >and RH made a point of saying they no longer support 586. > > > > 586 not supported? > > I just looked and there is an i586 kernel in the Centos 4.3 base repo, > as well as the 4.3 centosplus repo. The plus kernel is dated May 28, 2006. > > http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/4.3/centosplus/i386/RPMS/kernel-2.6.9-34.107.plus.c4.i586.rpm I didn't see that one! ... hmm Aha! I was doing a check update on my Athlon and forgot that it would *not* see a 586 version. Thanks! > > -Steve For the rest of my OP... Never Mind (Emily Latilla SNL) -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060608/9a41e7dd/attachment-0004.sig>