On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 17:17 -0400, Kurt Hansen wrote: > Jim Perrin wrote: > > >> In fact, the quality of the perl-related rpms from Red Hat is > >> the main reason I'm not using RHEL and using CentOS > > You choose not to use RHEL / CentOS, yet you are giving expert advice. > > > > Your logic is confusing to me. It does not resemble what I would > > consider to be rational thought. > > Is this the kind of rhetoric that is acceptable on this list? There is > no value to your comment except to insult. > > Do you have any experience with the rpms to which I'm referring? Do you > work with the same software I do? Jim Perrin is a CentOS admin ... so I would say he has a little bit of experience with this issue ... YES :) Installing perl modules from CPAN absolute worst possible solution and should be used only as the absolute last resort. Or, maybe you know more about this distro that the people who make it? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060601/f2901d33/attachment-0005.sig>