Karanbir Singh wrote: >Kurt Hansen wrote: > > >>Jim Perrin wrote: >> >> >> >>>>In fact, the quality of the perl-related rpms from Red Hat is >>>>the main reason I'm not using RHEL and using CentOS >>>> >>>> >>>Your logic is confusing to me. It does not resemble what I would >>>consider to be rational thought. >>> >>> >>Is this the kind of rhetoric that is acceptable on this list? There is >>no value to your comment except to insult. >> >> > >you are much confused, Kurt, as to what CentOS is and what packaging >policy with this distro is. I suggest you spend some time working that out. > >this isnt a Gentoo derevative, and never will be either. > > > Oh, so I should use a defective version of mod_perl and a sub-optimal version of perl on my system to maintain the "packaging policy"? When I have a solution that has worked for years, is versatile, and I understand. >>Do you have any experience with the rpms to which I'm referring? Do you >>work with the same software I do? >> >> > >well, considering you dont know much about the distro you are using, it >seems sort of academic to raise this question on your part. > > Considering that you don't know much about the software I use, I think you should consider refraining from commenting on my questions. Unless you have something constructive to say rather than make insults. Regards, Kurt Hansen