On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, Kurt Hansen wrote: > Jim Perrin wrote: > > Kurt Hansen wrote: > > > > > In fact, the quality of the perl-related rpms from Red Hat is > > > the main reason I'm not using RHEL and using CentOS > > > > Your logic is confusing to me. It does not resemble what I would > > consider to be rational thought. > > Is this the kind of rhetoric that is acceptable on this list? There is no > value to your comment except to insult. No, it's the kind of rhetoric that should make you reflect on what you've said instead of going into defensive or counter-attack mode. So let me lighten the pain: CentOS is a rebuild of RHEL. So if the perl-related rpms from Red Hat have a quality problem, the CentOS packages suffer from the same problem. > Do you have any experience with the rpms to which I'm referring? Do you work > with the same software I do? I fail to see why that is relevant in relation to what you stated about RHEL and CentOS. Although I found Jim's response amusing it should have caused self-reflection and maybe self-correction, instead of on outburst. Kind regards, -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power]