On Tue, 2006-13-06 at 00:04 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > the bug would be something to do with the way that package ( either the > x86_64 or the i386 one ) was built, or it could also be you had i386 > repo's enabled on the machine, and ran updates / installs against that > ). I have a i386 repo configured for CentOS-Base (CentOS-Base-i386.repo), but the only package enabled in it is Firefox. I also have kbsingh-CentOS-Extras, kbsingh-CentOS-Misc, and rpmforge repos, but they are all disabled. So, yum updates run against the x86_64 CentOS-Base repo, except for Firefox. > if you can, add some reproduceability instructions and add to bug #1356 > at http://bugs.centos.org/ that would help sort this issue out. Okay, will do. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.16-1.2111_FC4 i686 GNU/Linux 12:28:55 up 5:58, 4 users, load average: 0.11, 0.29, 0.24