> Maybe after work with FreeBSD I become too spoilt, but I expect that > packages from one distribution kit works among themselves well. But > that I see: Nothing like biting wit to start the morning. > $ rpm -qa | grep rpm > > rpm-libs-4.3.13_nonptl > rpm-python-4.3.13_nonptl > rpm-4.3.13_nonptl > rpm-build-4.3.13_nonptl Seems I've got the same versions you do. Couple additional packages, but nothing major. [jperrin at www ~]$ rpm -qa | grep rpm rpm-libs-4.3.3-13_nonptl rpm-build-4.3.3-13_nonptl rpm-python-4.3.3-13_nonptl rpmdb-CentOS-4.3-0.20060314 redhat-rpm-config-8.0.32.1-1 rpm-4.3.3-13_nonptl rpm-devel-4.3.3-13_nonptl > $python > >>> import rpm > ImportError /usr/lib/librpm-4.3.so: undefined symbol: rpm_execcon Yep. That's an error alright. However it works fine here. [jperrin at www ~]$ python Python 2.3.4 (#1, Mar 10 2006, 06:12:09) [GCC 3.4.5 20051201 (Red Hat 3.4.5-2)] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import rpm >>> >>> Now call me suspicious, but your python does not identify itself, and you don't seem to list the python version. Did you upgrade python? -- This message has been double ROT13 encoded for security. Anyone other than the intended recipient attempting to decode this message will be in violation of the DMCA