[CentOS] Re: Q's about switching from sendmail to postfix
John Thomas
gmane-2006-01-01 at jt-socal.comMon Mar 6 00:31:55 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Q's about switching from sendmail to postfix
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Q's about switching from sendmail to postfix
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Craig White wrote: > I also use MailScanner as my wrapper for spamassassin and clamav and > find it very, very effective (don't listen to the doom and gloom folks > that poo poo using MailScanner on Postfix) I had MailScanner installed and it worked great. I switched to Amavis-new because I was afraid the authors of postfix would stop support for MailScanner. Amavis-new has the same results as far as I can tell. > you do these things, you can forget all about rogue networks as you call > them and banned cidr's because you will stop almost all the spam with > the proper setup and don't need to do wholesale block of ip addresses. I agree with your conclusions. Greylisting and a tight postfix set up has my Spamassassin mostly idle. In fact, I have eliminated bayes from spamassassin because I do not get enough spam to train it well. I do use rulesdujour in spammassissn to get most of the few who make it through.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Q's about switching from sendmail to postfix
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Q's about switching from sendmail to postfix
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list