[CentOS] Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
Craig White
craigwhite at azapple.comSat Mar 25 04:03:53 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Next message: [CentOS] dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 15:41 -0800, Keith Morse wrote: > Les Mikesell wrote: > > Cyrus is designed for exactly that kind of environment and should > > give the best performance. > > But on the other hand cyrus is outside the scope of included packages > for Centos and will have to managed differently when dealing with > updates. Not to say it's bad or good, just something to consider when > accounting for sysadmin tasks and effort. ---- cyrus-imapd is part of base distribution for upstream and hence CentOS Craig
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Next message: [CentOS] dovecot vs Cyrus-Imapd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list