Hi all, Am I right to say that I have to install hylafax-4.2.5-1fc3.x86_64.rpm rather than hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.i386.rpm because the rpm command failed if tried to install the RHEL version. I am running an updated CentOS 4.2 x86_64. Thank you. Regards, Chin --- Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am Di, den 14.03.2006 schrieb Adriano Frare um 19:43: > > > Then, Install version hylafax-4.2.3-1rhel4 > > > > It's work. > > > > Adriano > > HylaFax 4.2.5 fixes 2 security issues older versions have: > > Security fix - hfaxd vulnerability CVE-2005-3538 > Security fix - script vulnerability CVE-2005-3539 > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp > Serendipity 02:08:19 up 1 day, 3:56, load average: 0.34, 0.26, 0.15 > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos. http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/