-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 08:37:53PM -0600, Jason Ish wrote: > libpcap-0.8.4 but I don't want it to replace the 0.8.3 package, so > I've modified the package name to be like <something>.libpcap-0.8.3... > > I know this may same weird, but is prefixing the package name a sane > approach to this? You can compare that with the compat- packages. So yes, I would think that is the recomended way to do it. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEJjkupdyWzQ5b5ckRAl9qAJ0R7D/LBUNXsT5t7iBFOPy4zWwmfwCgkzkm caTvCN3maS42f70mHZHfHYk= =BfND -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----