On Saturday 18 March 2006 08:45, Jim Smith wrote: > Some of the other RHEL rebuilds take one or two days, while CentOS > takes > 2 weeks. While i can't say if they have more than a hundred users, > their > speed in releasing quarterly updates is commendable. Mr. Smith, this is quite offensive. Each project has its own philosophy on releases; the CentOS philosophy is to release after the internal team has done thorough QA on the code. Another RHEL rebuild is Scientific Linux; they have released beta ISO's as of yesterday afternoon; however, my experience with SL is that this is likely the first of three or four beta ISO releases before the final quarterly update release, which typically takes (wait for it)..... two weeks, if not more. They just have made the process more visible. However, spinning ISOs takes resources; Connie Sieh has the resources of FermiLabs to do this, and uses them well, and is doing a great job. This is one reason I'd love to see CentOS and SL do more together; the combination of resources would be wonderful. Of course, there are a few differences in the distributions, and some of those might be showstoppers. I'm sure the SL team wouldn't mind you helping beta test their ISO's. -- Lamar Owen Director of Information Technology Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 (828)862-5554 www.pari.edu