Hi, Thank you for your help. I had rebuild the HylaFAX as you had suggested without any problem and running fine so far. --- Alexander Dalloz <ad+lists at uni-x.org> wrote: > Am Mi, den 15.03.2006 schrieb Chin um 2:23: > > > Hi all, > > > > Am I right to say that I have to install hylafax-4.2.5-1fc3.x86_64.rpm > rather > > than hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.i386.rpm because the rpm command failed if tried > to > > install the RHEL version. I am running an updated CentOS 4.2 x86_64. > > Thank you. > > > > Regards, > > Chin > > Generally you can run i386 software on x86_64 arch of CentOS. If you opt > for the x86_64 only alternate, then I wouldn't choose the FC3 RPM of > HylaFax as FC3 isn't identical with RHEL4, just a base for it's > development. I would take the SRC.RPM > > ftp://ftp.hylafax.org/binary/linux/redhat/SRPMS/hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.src.rpm > > and "rpmbuild --rebuild --target x86_64 hylafax-4.2.5-1rhel4.src.rpm" > it. > > Alexander > > > -- > Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 > legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html > Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp > Serendipity 22:00:58 up 4 days, 23:48, load average: 0.50, 0.48, 0.43 > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Movies - Search movie info and celeb profiles and photos. http://sg.movies.yahoo.com/