Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:05:46PM +0100, Ralph Angenendt wrote: > > kernel 2.6.9-34.EL still is based on kernel.org's 2.6.9 kernel, but has at > > least 700 patches in it (that is added up for all architectures, so your > > i386 kernel doesn't really have 700 patches applied to it). But the > > kernel-API is still the same as in 2.6.9 (later 2.6.x kernels have a > > different one). > > And there you are wrong. > > I give you the exemple of slmodemd, where you have to change it so it > detects the CentOS kernel as if it were 2.6.10+. Otherwise, it won't > even compile, due to difference on the headers. Hmmmm. Compiled fine without any changes here. slmodemd-2.9.10 that is. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060321/14ec19d0/attachment-0005.sig>