[CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
maillists at conactive.com
Sun May 7 20:53:58 UTC 2006
Johnny Hughes wrote on Sun, 07 May 2006 10:49:42 -0500:
> Assuming what I found to be true ... this is not a bug with yum or
> protectbase ... or even I problem with the repos individually ... but a
> problem if dag and kbs are used together.
It is a problem whenever a package obsoletes another package and that or
it's name is in other repos as well.
> If you want to use Dags repo for clamav:
> in the kbs-CentOS-Extras repo add this line:
Sure, I can do this, but I have to do this without protectbase, anyway.
> As a side note, this kind of problem happens quite frequently when more
> than one repo is used.
But the whole point of protectbase is that it *protects*, isn't it? I mean
in my eyes "protect" means "protect" against replacement by another repo
by whatever means. I don't care if it updates, obsoletes or whatever. Why
should "obsoletes" be handled different?
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
More information about the CentOS