[CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
Kai Schaetzl
maillists at conactive.comSun May 7 20:53:58 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
- Next message: [CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Johnny Hughes wrote on Sun, 07 May 2006 10:49:42 -0500: > Assuming what I found to be true ... this is not a bug with yum or > protectbase ... or even I problem with the repos individually ... but a > problem if dag and kbs are used together. It is a problem whenever a package obsoletes another package and that or it's name is in other repos as well. > ------------------------------------ > If you want to use Dags repo for clamav: > > in the kbs-CentOS-Extras repo add this line: > > exclude=clamav* Sure, I can do this, but I have to do this without protectbase, anyway. > As a side note, this kind of problem happens quite frequently when more > than one repo is used. But the whole point of protectbase is that it *protects*, isn't it? I mean in my eyes "protect" means "protect" against replacement by another repo by whatever means. I don't care if it updates, obsoletes or whatever. Why should "obsoletes" be handled different? Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
- Previous message: [CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
- Next message: [CentOS] differences between yum update and yum check-update
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list