On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 07:40 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 08:29 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 13:20 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > William L. Maltby wrote: > > > > > > > > <snip all evidence of chastisement for sloppy reply composition :-( > > But ... we have what we have. And yum is quite nice ... even with the > inconsistencies :) Ever since I re-read the yum manuals and other docs, I have totally abandoned yumex as not needed. May be just my predilection towards CLI rather than GUI, but I prefer to think of it as reduction of bloat. :-) I'll still make mistakes and have to refer to the manual(s) occasionally, but I'm happy with it. Perfect? Nope. So it matches me there too! =>:-O > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060531/fcb69d3c/attachment-0004.sig>