On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 18:07 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: > On Fri, 12 May 2006, Charles Lacroix wrote: > > > > > Woops, i would sugest changing your password ie, the one printed into the > > bounce message :) > > > > I hope you are not using this for anything else than mailling lists :) > > Thanks :) Actually it was a generated password (which mailman does if you > don't specify one). If I use passwords, I have them randomly generated by > Revelation with a size of 16. Consequently, I don't know any of those > passwords by heart. And thanks to Revelation, I don't have to. Is it just me or ... Putting a password, regardless of source, into a "probe", which by its very existence seems to have a higher likelihood of interception, seems foolish. If there is a problem along the intermediate steps (if any) and somebody is examining stuff, for righteous or nefarious reasons, ... > > Thanks again for the email. > > Kind regards, > -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- > [all I want is a warm bed and a kind word and unlimited power] > <snip sig stuff> -- Bill -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060512/dfb3ff02/attachment-0005.sig>