[CentOS] gnbd vs drbd
Rodrigo Barbosa
rodrigob at darkover.orgTue Nov 7 02:59:01 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] onboard adaptec SAS RAID controller not seeing drive(s)
- Next message: [CentOS] gnbd vs drbd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization issues (mostly on lab situations). Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFT/Z1pdyWzQ5b5ckRAiXlAJ9gAJNtx7amdZJ2gKfAsxmRSCm/zwCfYy9D zr7kN3JjBz1HY/5zgT0ylq8= =6FOA -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message: [CentOS] onboard adaptec SAS RAID controller not seeing drive(s)
- Next message: [CentOS] gnbd vs drbd
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list