[CentOS] bacula rpm --rebuild on x86_64?

[Gordon McLellan]

ok I have it narrowed down to a handful of dependencies now

[root at tachyon ~]# rpmbuild --rebuild --define "build_centos4 1"
--define "build_mysql4 1" --define "build_x86_64 1"
bacula-1.38.11-3.src.rpm
Installing bacula-1.38.11-3.src.rpm
error: Failed build dependencies:
        gtk2-devel >= 2.4 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64
        libgnomeui-devel >= 2.8 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64
        libart_lgpl-devel >= 2.3 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64
        libbonoboui-devel >= 2.8 is needed by bacula-1.38.11-3.x86_64

however, I have the latest versions of these packages available on the
repos.  I'm currently using fasttrack, dag, dries, kbs-extras,
kbs-misc.  Can anyone suggest alternate repos where I might find newer
versions?

Gordon


On 11/9/06, Gordon McLellan <gordonthree at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I found the source of the problem. I reran the yum
> localinstall with debug set to 10, and I see that the "protectbase"
> plugin is preventing certain packages from being updated to later
> versions.  I will download and try to install the latest stable
> release of bacula instead of the cutting edge beta!
>
> My mistake, it had nothing to do with 32/64 bit
>
> thanks,
> Gordon
>
>
> On 11/9/06, Aleksandar Milivojevic <alex at milivojevic.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Gordon McLellan <gordonthree at gmail.com>:
> >
> > > I tried to install the latest bacula last night, rebuilding from the
> > > source rpm ... this is the command line I used, following the
> > > instructions at bacula.org:
> > >
> > > # rpmbuild --rebuild --define "build_centos4 1" \
> > > --define "build_x86_64 1" --define "build_mysql4 1" bacula-1.39.26-1.src.rpm
> > >
> > > but the rebuild fails, citing all sorts of dependencies being
> > > required.   problem is, all the dependencies it mentions are for 386
> > > and/or 32 bit, not x86_64.   when I try doing a yum install
> > > somedependency, yum informs me it's already installed
> >
> > Well, in the output it provided, it never says it wants i386 versions
> > of those packages.  Do you have gcc-g++ and others installed on the
> > system?
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS at centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
>