Tim Uckun spake the following on 11/2/2006 4:09 PM: >> >> After removing all the stuff that depends on apache (mod_python, mod_ssl, >> http_suexec, webalizer, subversion, etc.), the Apache supplied RPMs >> seem to >> install fine. Of course you wouldn't be using all the same patches and >> configs from the CentOS rpm version, and there's no guarantee it will >> work >> well with the provided libraries (it probably will provided they have all >> their requires in the spec file correct). If you don't need any >> functionality out of Apache other than what you are putting in yourself >> (rails, mongrel, mod_proxy_balance), this might work. >> > > I didn't want to start down that path of uninstalling everything and > then reinstalling them again. I was kind of hoping there would be a > repository I could add to repos.d and then yum upgrade httpd. > > I am afraid I don't have the time or the expertise to try and roll my > own RPMs. You might have to wait for Enterprise 5 (CentOS 5) for apache 2.2 if you don't want to fight. Shouldn't be more than a few months. You could play on Fedora Core 6, as I think that is what RHEL 5 will be based on. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't!!!!