Rodrigo Barbosa wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 12:27:59PM +1300, MrKiwi wrote: > > I feel i should be leaning towards an IPSec VPN, would anyone agree? > > (exchanging keys is not a problem for us) > > If possible, my suggestion is always to use OpenVPN. > > Having used PPTP and IPSec on many places in the past, OpenVPN > proved to be the most simple and easy to have working (no NAT > issues, among other things) of the bunch. I only can second that. Fewer hassles than any of the other solutions and relatively painless. Ralph -- Ralph Angenendt......ra at br-online.de | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...80300 München | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Programmbereich.Bayern 3, Jugend und | .which cannot be justified on any other Multimedia.........Tl:089.5900.16023 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20061107/6160d0f8/attachment-0005.sig>