On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 09:28 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 07:29:24AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > I'm not sure it'd be a good idea in this case. Before, upstream was at least > > > maintaining a package in Fedora; this time around, it's being skipped. > > I think it is in (/ going to be in) RAWHIDE (or FC development ... > > whichever term you prefer). > > Not according to the package maintainer. See > <http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-October/msg00664.html>. > > I am with you (it does say that) ... however, there is indeed a firefox-2 rpm for fc7 in RAWHIDE :-P (just so you don't think I am making this stuff up) http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/source/SRPMS/ (currently it is this) firefox-2.0-2.fc7.src.rpm Will it stay or will it go ... no idea. I can barely speak for CentOS-4, I can certainly not do so for Fedora :P Thanks, Johnny Hughes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20061116/bb21af60/attachment-0005.sig>