[CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
Steve Bergman
sbergman at rueb.comThu Oct 5 06:08:39 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Next message: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 20:36 -0700, Kirk Bocek wrote: > > MB/Sec > Write Read > XFS: 231 202 > ext2, dir_index: > 221 205 > ext3, dir_index, data=ordered: > 80 196 > ext3, dir_index, data=writeback: > 95 199 > ext3, data=writeback: > 95 201 > > Steve, you say you've been happy with XFS for a few years. Have you been using > it under any kind of load? > Thanks for the numbers. I didn't say I was happy with XFS. I said I don't use it and have heard horror stories about it. Does anyone know the details as to the work that has gone on in recent kernel.org kernels regarding write barriers? Isn't it supposed to eliminate the need for turning hardware write caching off?
- Previous message: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Next message: [CentOS] Calling All FS Fanatics
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list