[CentOS] fftw upgrade?

Sat Oct 7 09:15:35 UTC 2006
Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com>

On Sat, 2006-10-07 at 07:20 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Kjeldgaard Morten wrote:
> > Thanks. On rpmforge, fftw ver. 3.* is called fftw3. It is really  
> > pretty bad practice to distribute version 3 as a simple upgrade to  
> > fftw ver. 2.* when the two versions are not compatible, and the API  
> > has changed...
> 
> But you're barking up the wrong tree: fftw is not an application which
> comes with CentOS, you should take that to the rpmforge users list.
> 
> BTW: kbs-CentOS-Extras still has the fftw2 version (and it's still
> called fftw there).
> 
> Ralph

Just for the record (and as Ralph said)

 ... fftw is not at all part of CentOS ... or RHEL ...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20061007/3d76d38d/attachment-0004.sig>