nopers. that will only price legit users out of hte market and e-mail will be nearly 100% spam after that. DamianS wrote: > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 22:24 -0500, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: >> chrism at imntv.com wrote: >>> I wish the penalties for polluting the internet were half as potent as >>> those for polluting the ocean. Perhaps then we'd see some improvement. >> There's no way to block 100% of spam. There are tools and techniques to >> block some of it. There are some RFC drafts that might prevent spammers >> to use your domain as sender's address (but this is mostly thing of the >> future, if those drafts ever get widely deployed standards). And that's >> about it. >> > > There is a way to block 99% of spam though. > That solution is for ISPs to start charging money for each email sent! > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- My "Foundation" verse: Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD. -- carpe ductum -- "Grab the tape" CDTT (Certified Duct Tape Technician) Linux user #322099 Machines: 206822 256638 276825 http://counter.li.org/