[CentOS] yum vs up2date
lance at uklinux.net
Thu Sep 7 21:00:15 UTC 2006
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:08 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>>> What's the problem with that scheme? It's hundreds of times
>>>> faster on my second and subsequent machines - and would be for
>>>> anyone else going through a proxy configured to cache large
>>> What is wrong with that scheme is that only 1 mirror is listed ...
>>> if you loose the connection, if it gets overloaded in the middle of
>>> your transfer, etc. then there is no failover.
>> Doesn't your geo-ip enabled DNS service drop non-responding servers?
>> It has been much less trouble in practice from my locations than the
>> fedora or centos4 repositories.
> But there is no geo-IP in Centos3 ...
Actually we do use geo-IP in the backend dns for mirror.centos.org - using
powerdns and some custom perl.
That looks at the users location and will give a relevant mirror - however
as we only have mirror servers in the us and eu it is prety moot for .au
We use that because it can give out one of a random list oif mirrors and
thus spreads the load, whereas previously both yum and up2date hit only
one of the set of mirrors in rrdns - due to a bug in the python libraries,
and so all the load was taken by one server.
The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.
More information about the CentOS