[CentOS] Saw this and thought warmly of everyone on the list
mailing-lists at hughesjr.com
Tue Sep 19 00:56:38 UTC 2006
On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 22:48 +0100, Peter Farrow wrote:
> oops forgot the link, if I was using SELinux I could have blaming it for
> removing it....
> Peter Farrow wrote:
> > see points for 12 and 13 to substantiate my previous post....
> > so its not secure and its not trusted and its not going to be B1 and
> > C2 evaluated and point 16 is a killer,
> > point 17 is icing on the cake, (I think SElinux is about 6 feet under
> > by now)
> > so bring on the flames, your gonna have to do really well to justify
> > it now.... (lol)
> > And all these points are from the authors of SELinux, so save yourself
> > the trouble and disable it...
> > :-P
SELinux is in CentOS-4 and the upcoming CentOS-5 ... Novell has AppArmor
(a similar technology).
SELinux is different ... but it is certainly more secure than not
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the CentOS