[CentOS] yum vs up2date
William L. Maltby
CentOS4Bill at triad.rr.comThu Sep 7 16:39:10 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 00:24 +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > Jim Perrin wrote: > > On 9/7/06, John Summerfield <debian at herakles.homelinux.org> wrote: > > > >> Jim Perrin wrote: > >> >><snip> > I'm not going to all this trouble to cause grief, I want something that > works properly _for the user_, not that just seems to work. I'm a user. It WFM. If you said "for additional users", I don't think anyone would see that as objectionable. <snip> -- Bill
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list