[CentOS] yum vs up2date
Lance Davis
lance at uklinux.netThu Sep 7 21:12:36 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, William L. Maltby wrote: > What I was thinking (one of many possibilities) was along the lines of > "include" directives similar to... e.g. xinetd or many other packages. > Might want a slightly different name. Regardless, it would cause > inclusion of a file of mirrors, maybe hand generated by the user, that > would be tried before the list normally returned by the current > mirroring functionality. I suggest that you may take this suggestion to the yum mailing list - it is beyond what we would expect to do - we just configure the thing. Lance -- uklinux.net - The ISP of choice for the discerning Linux user.
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list