[CentOS] yum vs up2date
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgThu Sep 7 22:49:37 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Karanbir Singh wrote: > William L. Maltby wrote: >> >> What I was thinking (one of many possibilities) was along the lines of >> "include" directives similar to... e.g. xinetd or many other packages. >> Might want a slightly different name. Regardless, it would cause >> inclusion of a file of mirrors, maybe hand generated by the user, that >> would be tried before the list normally returned by the current >> mirroring functionality. >> > > rtfm, this is presently possible. feel tree to mod you .repo to suit. > while you could grow a tree, i suggest we do a s/tree/free/ on that one line. -- Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522219 at icq
- Previous message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Next message: [CentOS] yum vs up2date
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list