[CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
Jim Perrin
jperrin at gmail.comFri Sep 8 01:43:14 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Next message: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > Awesome... Next server has HT.. So I'll give that a try! Keep in mind that HT is its own special brand of hell, and isn't really *true* SMP. The kernel will work fine, and you'll see 2x the processors, but at most you'll get about a 3% performance boost, and at worst, it'll actually hurt performance. Some motherboards have buggy HT implementations and may cause some locking or slowness. Sometimes this can be resolved by appending apci=ht to your kernel boot line. With HT you also have the possibility of cache thrashing, which can/will impact performance. Make sure you know what you're getting into. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell
- Previous message: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Next message: [CentOS] Kernel ELsmp vs EL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list