[CentOS] bugzilla; was: openssl package possibly different in CentOS and RHEL
David Hrbáč
hrbac.conf at seznam.czSat Sep 9 05:54:03 UTC 2006
- Previous message: [CentOS] bugzilla; was: openssl package possibly different in CentOS and RHEL
- Next message: [CentOS] openssl package possibly different in CentOS and RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
R P Herrold napsal(a): > On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, Aleksandar Milivojevic wrote: > >> BTW, any chance CentOS will switch to Bugzilla? ;-) >> >> The current system is... well... different... Probably the reason I >> usually fire off mail to mailing list, instead of going to >> bugs.centos.org. I personally find Bugzilla easier to use, and that is >> what almost everything else uses to track bugs (except few odd >> projets, like CentOS). > > heh -- actually new 'bugzilla' installs seem rarer than new 'trac' > installs. > Good to mention. I guess we can think about switching to trac. Mantis suits pretty well now. Just imagine. Running trac we have ticketing system, wiki, and SVN together. I know trac is hard to get running vs mantis. But we can have e.g. specs files in SVN and access to spec files could help users with problems regarding updated rpms, etc. Regards, David
- Previous message: [CentOS] bugzilla; was: openssl package possibly different in CentOS and RHEL
- Next message: [CentOS] openssl package possibly different in CentOS and RHEL
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list