On Thu, 2006-09-21 at 09:15 -0400, chrism at imntv.com wrote: > Lamar Owen wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 13:10, Peter Farrow wrote: > > > >> Since SElinux seems to spawned as an intern type project and nothing > >> more, what I object to is it being enabled by default. > >> > > > > NSA doesn't do 'intern type' projects. > > > > Your objections have no relevance to what goes into or does not go into > > CentOS; that is pretty well already determined, and, if you don't like it, > > either use something else or grin and bear it. > > > > Even though I agree with the sentiment that SElinux should be off by > default, I have to say that I also don't find it terribly useful (for > anyone) to bitch about it on this list. It is VERY easy to turn off for > those that don't want or don't need it. Life's too short.... > > Cheers, That's a start Chris...you know, this has nothing at all to do w/centos at all! It's bs! you have this big of a problem w/selinux then either take it to selinux or redhat! Not here, What would you expect Centos to do about this? Do you realize what centos is? You should...Is your bottom line intention that you want to see centos to vere away from redhat because you are too damn lazy to just disable selinux during an install? This is really absurd. You know, I don't run selinux only because I don't know it yet but back around the circle, why are we here? because we like redhat. why would you run centos if you don't like redhat? you like redhat because they do a lot of things right. Redhat chooses to set the default option to active or whatever it is. They must have their reasons, I bet that outside the team, I perform centos installs more than 99% of this msg. list and everytime I set selinux to disable I guess I should stop, get all pissed off, get the stomach acids pumping because I had to click it to disabled..Wow what a hoot!!! let the dead rest! john rose