On 9/7/06, Johnny Hughes <mailing-lists at hughesjr.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 09:48 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > Alok Garg wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I installed kernel version 2.6.9-42.0.2.plus.c4 a few days ago .my > > > home partition is formatted with xfs .But this version is refusing to > > > recognize xfs filesystem.the version before that(2.6.9-34.108.plus.c4) > > > is working fine. Do anyhave any idea what is going on.Arent all centos > > > plus kernel supposed to have support for xfs and ntfs etc. > > > > > > > xfs is now only available as an additional rpm, which can be used with > > either the plus or the distro kernel > > The file you are looking for is in: > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/4/centosplus/i386/RPMS/ > > (or substitute x86_64 for i386) > > and named: > kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.plus.c4-0.1-3.?????.rpm I installed kernel-module-xfs-2.6.9-42.0.2.EL-0.1-3.i686.rpm from the site you mentioned . But it is still unable to mount xfs filesystem at boot time.It gives following error. mount: fs type xfs not supported by kernel after booting up in 2.6.9-42.0.2.plus.c4 if i issue command "modprobe xfs" it gives an error about module not found.But following files are present on system. /lib/modules/2.6.9-42.0.2.EL/extra/xfs.ko /lib/modules/2.6.9-42.0.2.EL/extra/xfs_quota.ko I am using centos 4.4. Regards, Alok (where ????? is the arch) > > There are also smp, hugemem, largesmp, etc. kernels and has Karanbir > said, there are also xfs modules for the normal kernels as well there. > > This is required to get better XFS provided directly by SGI that is > newer than the 2.6.9 code used by the upstream provider. > > Thanks, > Johnny Hughes > > > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20060907/4f3782ec/attachment-0005.html>