oops forgot the link, if I was using SELinux I could have blaming it for removing it.... http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/info/faq.cfm#I2 Peter Farrow wrote: > see points for 12 and 13 to substantiate my previous post.... > > so its not secure and its not trusted and its not going to be B1 and > C2 evaluated and point 16 is a killer, > > point 17 is icing on the cake, (I think SElinux is about 6 feet under > by now) > > so bring on the flames, your gonna have to do really well to justify > it now.... (lol) > > And all these points are from the authors of SELinux, so save yourself > the trouble and disable it... > > :-P > > > > > Peter Farrow wrote: >> http://pietrovischia.altervista.org/blog/index.php/2006/09/14/selinux-is-shit/ >> >> >> > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by the Enhancion system Scanner and is believed to be clean. http://www.enhancion.net