[CentOS] Re: [CSL #329283] centosplus XFS bug?

[Johnny Hughes]

On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 08:55 -0500, David Thompson wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> >Dave,
> >
> >I would guess that this is not in there ... but I will double check and
> >see if we can get it rolled in.
> >
> >I should be in the CentOS-5 module though.
> 
> It's going to be awhile before we'll be ready to upgrade that host to CentOS 
> 5, so I'm looking at either getting a different xfs module for c4 or switching 
> the partition back to ext3.
> 
> So that I understand what I'm installing for c5, will the CentOS 5 xfs module 
> for the mainline ("compatible with upstream") kernels be based on the 
> in-kernel source, or will it be a replacement module (as in CentOS 4)?  How 
> about the centosplus kernels?
> 

The modules will be compiled separately ... however early testing is not
going well on the i386 distro there either.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070426/ec518ad2/attachment.sig>