[CentOS] Re: Centos 5 timeline?
Matthew Miller
mattdm at mattdm.orgThu Apr 5 20:19:16 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Centos 5 timeline?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Re: Centos 5 timeline?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 02:48:27PM -0500, Larry Vaden wrote: > >If I am allowed to add one more thing: > >Please do not top-post. > This is a personal preference; most professional records are kept > with the most recent item on top (read: at the front) of a physical > file. Even the public library does it that way :) It may be a personal preference, but if you'd prefer to respect the people providing you help on a mailing list, you'd do well to use the format that is easier for those helping. Top-posting is another way of saying "my time is more valuable than yours." Don't do it. -- Matthew Miller mattdm at mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/>
- Previous message: [CentOS] Re: Centos 5 timeline?
- Next message: [CentOS] Re: Re: Centos 5 timeline?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list