[CentOS] Re: Centos 5 timeline?
David G. Miller
dave at davenjudy.orgFri Apr 6 17:30:27 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Centos 5 timeline?
- Next message: [CentOS] Centos 5 timeline?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Larry Vaden" <vaden at texoma.net> wrote: > On 4/5/07, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: >> > If I am allowed to add one more thing: >> > >> > Please do not top-post. >> > > This is a personal preference; most professional records are kept > with the most recent item on top (read: at the front) of a physical > file. Even the public library does it that way :) > > rgds/ldv The following was shamelessly plagiarized from the signature of Steve Searle on the Fedora-list: A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting a bad thing? I think that nicely sums up why top-posting is a bad idea. Cheers, Dave -- Politics, n. Strife of interests masquerading as a contest of principles. -- Ambrose Bierce
- Previous message: [CentOS] Centos 5 timeline?
- Next message: [CentOS] Centos 5 timeline?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list