Cen Tos wrote: > > On 4/2/07, Ralph Angenendt <[1]ra+centos at br-online.de> wrote: > > Cen Tos wrote: > > Does this mean that effective the existing Centos 5 Beta (4.92) > > will be the same as the final Centos 5 release? i.e. whatever works > > in beta will be working in 5 and whatever isn't will still not be > > working? > Ermm, no? > > Why not? I'm not doubting you. > But just want to find out what else influences the situation apart from the > fact, or so I infer from Johnny's message, that the files are all largely > going to be the same except for a couple of renames? Well, maybe you want to define what you mean by "whatever isn't working will still not be working". The difference between beta and release is *huge*. I'm just saying that this isn't so. Ralph -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070402/3e1371ab/attachment-0005.sig>