On 4/7/07, DamianS <dsteward at internode.on.net> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 12:14 +1000, Andy wrote: > > On Sunday 08 April 2007 03:00, centos-request at centos.org wrote: > > > I wonder if this is one of the most anticipated releases or if it just feels > > > like it is. Either way the mirrors should be getting hammered when it's out. > > > > I suspect this release is widely and eagerly anticipated. There will be many our here like me who are looking to migrate to a stable, long-term upgradeable distro that comes with a specification that is not far behind the latest "cool but buggy" efforts. Some people want a Linux to experiment with, others need one they can rely on to earn a living. CentOS 5 looks like it should fit the bill. > > > Not wishing to put a dampener on things, but I don't think CentOS 5 will > be any more eagerly anticipated than CentOS 4 or CentOS 3. > And as for 'cool but buggy', there are still many people who consider > the 2.6 kernel is not yet up to production standard, and insist on using > 2.4 Heck 2.4 is crap. I am using my 2.2 systems for the important work -- Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"