John Summerfield wrote:
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> I was just thinking of the bandwidth that the CentOS team doesn't have
>> to pay
>> for with bittorrent. But I do agree that jigdo is a better system for the
>> end-user and for those with pricey last-mile connections, or you in
>> Perth,
>> where you probably have to pay for anything that crosses the ocean.
>>
>
> Our local mirrors are even better for CentOS servers. Even though they
> won't server the world, CentOS would do well to work with them to make
> them easy to find.
Will the yum in Centos5 work with caching proxies for updates like it
did in Centos3 or will it come up with a different URL from each machine
and defeat the cache like the Centos4 does?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com