On Apr 25, 2007, at 9:35 AM, Tarun Reddy wrote: > > On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 22:35 -0600, Tarun Reddy wrote: >>> On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 10:08 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>>>>> I Just installed the new CentOSplus kernel package for CentOS 5 >>>>>> on my >>>>>> test workstation, so far so good. I was a bit surprised to note >>>>>> that it >>>>>> didn't include the IEEE1394/Firewire modules. Was this >>>>>> intentional or >>>>>> merely an oversight? I realize that including them in a >>>>>> server is >>>>>> probably a bad idea, but I had been using CentOS 4 with the -plus >>>>>> kernel >>>>>> on my workstation to grab video from my Sony DV camera. No >>>>>> problem if >>>>>> it's not going to be there, I can just build a custom kernel >>>>>> if it's >>>>>> that important to me. >>>>> >>>>> I submitted a request for the firewire support some time ago: >>>>> >>>>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=1909 >>>>> >>>>> So, hopefully it will be added... >>>>> >>>>> Akemi >>>> >>>> It was overlooked ... I will add this (and anything else that we >>>> find we >>>> need) and respin the kernels for final release. >>> >>> Sigh, >>> This is what I get for being excited and update my machine before >>> actually looking at the RPMs.... >>> >>> It appears that the jfs kernel module isn't built yet for the >>> CentOSplus kernel. So while fsck.jfs does work, I can't get >>> Centos to >>> actually mount my jfs partition. Of course I may have screwed >>> something up, too. >>> >>> I have this line in /etc/fstab >>> /dev/md2 /export jfs >>> defaults 1 1 >>> >>> and when I do a mount /export >>> I get >>> mount: unknown filesystem type 'jfs' >>> >>> uname -a >>> Linux fw.tarun.homeip.net 2.6.18-8.1.1.el5.centos.plusxen #1 SMP Mon >>> Apr 16 07:34:51 CDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux >>> >>> Any ideas? >>> >> >> I have one .. somehow, the JFS was not turned on in the x86 >> kernel ... >> let me respin the kernels with all the proper config files and >> turn on >> firewire. >> >> I'll get another kernel out today for testing >> >> Thanks, >> Johnny Hughes >> > That's funny, I actually look at that last night, but since I moved > from i386 to x86_64, I only looked at the kernel-xen i386.config > file in the kernel SRPM and saw that CONFIG_JFS_FS=m. Now that I > look in the x86_64 kernel, it is not set. I'm going to try and > rebuild as well.. just for the heck of it. > Well I changed that, and rebuilt the rpms, and no love. rpm -qpl kernel or kernel-xen don't show any jfs components. kernel-debuginfo- common shows a bunch of jfs stuff but they are just .c files. No help there. I guess I'll see what Johnny comes up with. Probably a more serious build bug. (FWIW, I just did a rpmbuild --bb kernel-2.6.spec after install the SRPM) Tarun