[CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd)onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0
Ross S. W. Walker
rwalker at medallion.comFri Aug 3 04:12:55 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0
- Next message: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org > [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Mark Hull-Richter > Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 6:05 PM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no > ftpd)onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0 > > On 8/2/07, Ross S. W. Walker <rwalker at medallion.com> wrote: > > > > Yeah... it should be 644 > > > > Ah, a light goes on. I have the root umask set to 027. I take it > from this that it should be 022 or 002 - which is better/correct? 022 is what you'll want 002 leaks too much to the group. -Ross ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof.
- Previous message: [CentOS] Another oddity - users get no ftp (no ftpd) onlatestupdate from CentOS 5.0
- Next message: [CentOS] Chmod Explaination
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list