[CentOS] SATA vs. SAS
Peter Kjellstrom
cap at nsc.liu.seThu Aug 23 13:07:59 UTC 2007
- Previous message: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS
- Next message: [CentOS] Force run of quotacheck at boot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wednesday 22 August 2007, Rajeev R Veedu wrote: ... > Option 1) 2 servers each having 2.0TB raid disk with SAS drives, 2GB ram > and standard other features. > > Option 2) 4 No servers with 1TB each with 2GB ram and standard other > features. Late comment on this thread. Really short comment actually: SAS vs. SATA is not the issue, raid controller A vs. B is. /Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070823/a6129077/attachment-0001.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS] SATA vs. SAS
- Next message: [CentOS] Force run of quotacheck at boot
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS mailing list